The ED clinician must be able to distinguish between true pathologic back pain and nonorganic back pain.
Waddell’s signs are physical exam findings that can aid in making this important distinction and can be remembered by the acronym “DORST” (Distraction, Over-reaction, Regional disturbances, Simulation tests and Tenderness).
Superficial, non-anatomic, or variable tenderness during the physical exam suggests a non-organic cause.
The clinician may also simulate back pain through provocative maneuvers such as axial loading of the head or passive rotation of the shoulders and pelvis in the same plane. Neither maneuver should elicit low back pain.
There may be a discrepancy between the symptoms reported during the supine and sitting straight leg raise (SLR). The seated version of the test, sometimes termed the distracted SLR, can be performed while distracting the patient or appearing to focus on the knee. Further, radicular pain elicited at a leg elevation of less than 30° degrees is suspicious because the nerve root and surrounding dura do not move in the neural foramen until an elevation of more than 30° degrees is reached.
Sensory and motor findings suggestive of a nonorganic cause include stocking, glove or non-dermatomal sensory loss or weakness that can be characterized as “give-way,” jerky or cogwheel.
Finally, gross overreaction is suggested by the exaggerated, inconsistent painful responses to a stimulus.
Waddell’s signs, especially if three or more are present, correlate with malingering and functional complaints (physical findings without anatomic cause). When combined with shoulder motion and neck motion producing lower back pain, Waddell’s signs predict a decreased probability of the individual returning to work.
That said, Waddell’s signs should never be used independently because they lack the sensitivity and specificity to rule out true organic pathology. Further, our focus should be on evaluating for medical emergencies. Malingering and psychosocial causes of pain are diagnosis of exclusion.
ISPAD (International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes) Updated their Guidelines for Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) in 2014
Fluids:
· Begin fluid repletion with 10-20ml/kg of 0.9% NS over 1-2 hours
· Estimate losses (mild DKA <5%, moderate 5-7%, severe ~10%) and replete evenly over 48 hours
o Use NS, Ringers or Plasmalyte for 4-6 hours
o Afterwards use any crystalloid, tonicity at least 0.45% NaCl
· Add 5% glucose to IV fluid when glucose falls below 250-300mg/dL
Insulin
· No bolus
· Low dose 0.05 - 0.1U/kg/hr AFTER initiating fluid therapy
o higher incidence of cerebral edema in patients given insulin in 1st hour
· Short acting subQ insulin lispro or aspart can be substituted for drip in uncomplicated mild DKA
· Give long acting subQ insulin at least 2 hours before stopping infusion to prevent rebound
Potassium
· If K low (< 3.3): add 40mmol/L with bolus IV fluids (20mmol/L if rate > 10ml/kg/hr)
· if K normal (3.3-5): add 40mmol/L when insulin is started
· If K high (> 5): add 40mEq/L after urine output is documented
Bicarb
· No role for bicarbonate in treatment of Pediatric DKA
o No benefit, possibility of harm (paradoxical CNS acidosis)
Elsberg syndrome is sacral radiculitis caused by a viral infection, most commonly herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) - whether a primary infection or a reactivation. The typical patient is a young sexually active woman presenting wtih acute transient urinary retention and sensory lumbosacral symptoms, such as dull pain in anorectal region, paresthesias, loss of sensation or flaccid paresis of leg muscles. Patients can also have constipation or erectile dysfunction.
The presence of inguinal lymphadenopathy and/or anogenital rash can be important clues but are not necessary for diagnosis. CSF may show mild to moderate pleocytosis, with a mild elevation in proteins. Herpes PCR in the CSF may be positive as well. The MRI may show varying degrees of root or lower spinal cord edema with hyperintensity of T2-weighted images.
In immunocompetent patient, the disease usually self limiting, usually resolving in 4-10 days, but can be progressive and ascending in patients with immunocompromise, such as HIV or cancer. Antiviral treatment may shorten the duration of illness in cases with confirmed herpes, either oral or IV.
Stop looking for the “Best PEEP”, aim for a “Better PEEP”
Mechanical ventilation settings in the patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) need to provide adequate gas exchange and prevent ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is often prescribed with consideration of the patient’s FiO2 requirement, estimated chest wall compliance, and hemodynamic tolerance.
So what is the best strategy for PEEP prescription?
In a recent review, Gattinoni & colleagues analyzed a number of the recent studies examining PEEP optimization. In this paper, the authors conclude that there is no “Best PEEP,” and regardless of the level chosen there will be some degree of intratidal recruitment-derecruitment and VILI. They go on to recommend a PEEP prescription strategy that reflects the severity of ARDS using the patient’s PaO2/FiO2 or P/F ratio.
Bottom line: There is no “Best PEEP” however, a “Better PEEP” is one that is primarily tailored to the severity of the patient’s ARDS, but also compensates for chest wall resistance and minimizes hemodynamic compromise.
References
Follow me on Twitter @JohnGreenwoodMD
25 year-old male with autoimmune enteropathy presents with intractable vomiting and diarrhea for 7 days. What's the diagnosis?
Acute Pericarditis
- Pericarditis has numerous etiologies; in developed countries 80-90% of cases are idiopathic/viral & 10-20% of cases are most commonly post-cardiac injury syndromes, connective-tissue diseases, or cancer.
- Diagnosis requires at least two of the following symptoms or signs: chest pain, pericardial friction rub, typical electrocardiographic changes, and pericardial effusion.
- Since pleuritic chest pain has many possible causes, pericarditis should be diagnosed with caution in the absence of other clinical criteria, additionally a friction rub & ECG findings may be transient making the diagnosis even more challenging.
- Data from a recent RCT indicated that pericardial effusions are present in ~2/3 of patients; the vast majority are small and of no concern, nonetheless an echocardiogram is routinely indicated and if present should be carefully followed to assess for tamponade.
- Treatment for idiopathic/viral cases of pericarditis consistents of NSAIDs & colchicine.
It is commonly taught that radiographs are not needed in non-traumatic back pain unless the patient is <18 or > 65 years old. Several studies have started to disprove this in the pediatric population, and a recent study in JAMA is giving some weight to not having to do this in the eldery.
The JAMA study was a prospective cohort of 5239 patients over age 65 who presented to a PCP or urgent care center in three different health systems from 2011-2013 with a complaint of back pain without radiculopathy. Patients were determined to have early imaging if they had a plain films, CT, or MRI done within 6 weeks of their initial visit for back pain. The primary outcome measure was back or leg-pain related disability at 12 months when comparing those that had early imaging versus late (> 6 weeks). They excluded patients with prior surgery, prior back pain, or if they had a cancer visit in the prior year.
At one year they found that there was no statistical difference in the primary outcome of back or leg-pain related disability at one year. The early imaging did pick up more fractures of the spine, but again no change in long term outcomes. The serious diagnoses were summarized in this graph.
This study was not done in the Emergency Medicine setting, and our patients may not be equivilant, but it suggests that we do NOT have to get radiographs on all patients over 65 years old with non-traumatic back pain without radiculopathy. If you are not going to get radiographs make sure your patient has clear discharge instructions on what to return for and that they should follow up with their primary care provider within a week.
A link to the full article is here http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2203801
Elevation of AST or ALT >1000 after acute ingestion of acetaminophen indicate hepatic toxicity. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is an effective treatment for acute acetaminophen poisoning. However, in a setting a significant transaminitis, (> 1000s) NAC infusion is continued beyond the routine 21-hour protocol.
Currently, there is no specific guideline or “level” of AST or ALT where discontinuing NAC is deemed safe and appropriate.
A recent retrospective study (n = 37 patients with 343 pairs of AST/ALT) evaluated AST/ALT ratio as a possible indicator for discontinuing NAC infusion after an acute acetaminophen induced hepatic toxicity.
This study found that post peak AST/ALT ratio of < 0.4 had sensitivity of 99% for identifying patients with resolving hepatic injury.
This finding requires validation prior to clinical application but this may be the first step to identifying a safe indicator to help guide clinician when NAC can be discontinued safely.
Whether in the U.S. or overseas, there are four main phases of emergency management:
The results of a multi-center trial from the UK, the ProMISe trial, were just released and it confirms what two prior studies (i.e., ProCESS and ARISE) have already shown; there does not appear to be any difference in mortality when septic patients are treated with a strategy of early-goal directed therapy as compared to usual care.
Patients were included in the ProMISe trial if they were in septic shock and were then randomized to either the EGDT group (630 patients) or the usual care group (630 patients); a total of 1,260.
The primary end-point was all cause mortality at 90 days and there was no difference shown in the primary outcome. There were no differences found in the measured secondary outcomes (e.g., serious adverse events)
This trial adds to the evidence that septic patients may not benefit from protocolized (i.e., EGDT) care versus usual care. One explaination why, is that our "usual care" in 2015 has significantly changed since the introduction of EGDT in 2001.
Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of child abuse.
It aids in the identification, evaluation and in treatment.
Additionally, it is often the only objective evidence of abuse available to the courts.
It is often discovered through two means.
1) Injuries/fractures that are inconsistent with the alleged mechanism of injury.
2) Pathognomonic fracture patterns are found on routine radiographs
The ED physician should not attempt to precisely "date" the injury.
That said, soft tissue swelling resolves in 2-5 days. The periosteum becomes radiodense in 7 to 10 days. In subtle fractures this may be the only radiographic finding. If there is no evidence of bone healing (periosteal reaction), the fracture is less than 2 weeks old. Callus formation and resorption of the bone along the fracture line begins at 10 to 14 days. The callus is visible for up to 3 months. Bone remodeling continues for up to one year.
In the midst of an unprecedented opioid epidemic, there have been considerable efforts to expand access to naloxone (Doyon S, et al. J Med Toxicol 2014;10:431-4). If the situation arises when you need to write a prescription for it, here's how:
Option 1: Naloxone vial and needle traditional IM/SQ using 0.4 mg/mL injection vial and needles (least expensive $40, FDA approved)
Naloxone 0.4 mg/mL single dose vial and 3 cc, 23 g, 1 inch syringes, #2 each
SIG: Inject 1 mL intramuscularly upon signs of opioid overdose. May repeat X 1. Call 911.
Option 2: IMS/Amphastar 2 mg/2 mL prefilled syringe and mucosal atomization device ($95/kit, products FDA approved but intranasal administration is off-label)
Naloxone 2 mg/2 mL prefilled syringe and intranasal atomizer device, #2 each
SIG: Spray one-half of syringe (1 mL) into each nostril upon signs of opioid overdose. May repeat X 1. Call 911.
Option 3: Evzio Autoinjector ($200-700 per Rx though many insurances cover it and the company has vouchers available, FDA approved in 2014, evzio.com/hcp)
Evzio 0.4 mg, #1 two-pack
SIG: Use as directed upon signs of opioid overdose. May repeat X 1. Call 911.
Cauda Equina Syndrome is a true neurologic and surgical emergency. Unfortunately, no constellation of symptoms or exam findings is 100% sensitive. In fact, no single symptoms predicts the radiographic finding of cauda equina syndrome with an accuracy greater than 65%.
The most common symptoms are sciatica (96%), micturition dysfunction (89%), saddle anesthesia or hypoethesia (81%) and defecation dysfunction (47%).
Transfusion in Major Trauma: The PROPPR Trial
What should we be transfusing in major trauma?
The Trial
Results
Conclusions
How does this affect my practice?
A 1:1:1 transfusion practice is safe and can decrease mortality from hemorrhage in major trauma
Other points: control bleeding, permissive hypotension, avoid crystalloids, use TEG to guide therapy (TXA etc)
35 year-old female presents with acute leg pain and swelling. What's the diagnosis?
Afib Clinical Decision Aid: AFFORD
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects ~34 million people worldwide; the hospital admission rates vary with frequencies of 81%, 62%, and 24% in the US, Australia, and Canada respectively.
- Lack of a reproducible and accurate risk stratification/decision aid likely contributes to variability in ED disposition.
- AFFORD (Atrial fibrillation and flutter outcome risk determination) was the 1st clinical decision aid (contains 17 variables) to predict 30-day adverse events in a prospective ED patient cohort with acute symptomatic AF.
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center's ED (2010-2013) derived and internal validated an ED based clinical decision aid for prediction of MACE within 30 days utilizing the AFFORD decision aid in hemodynamically stable patients whose AF reverted to sinus rhythm, either spontaneously or after cardioversion (pharmacologic or electrical), and those who are adequately rate controlled and candidates for outpatient management.
- Incorporating AFFORD with a shared decision model into ED practice may help identify patients at low risk and potentially reduce rate of hospitalizations.
Emergency Departments are increasingly searching for alternatives to opioids for acute pain management.
An urban trauma center in California retrospectively evaluated their use of low-dose ketamine for acute pain over a two-year period. [1]
Application to Clinical Practice
There was no comparison group and there was no mention of what other pain medicines were given. Adverse events are often under-reported in retrospective studies. This study seems to demonstrate that low-dose ketamine administration for acute pain management in the ED is feasible with a low rate of adverse effects.
It's worth noting that a new review of 4 randomized controlled trials evaluating subdissociative-dose ketamine found no convincing evidence to support or refute its use in the ED. The 4 included trials had methodologic limitations. [2]
