Fractures of the occipital condyles are a relatively rare injury that occur in high energy blunt mechanisms (IE roll over MVC) most commonly. Physical exam will show signs of basilar skull fracture and significant pain at the base of the skull/upper C-spine. CT scan is the gold standard to make the diagnosis. Look for signs of upper extremity weakness on physical exam or cranial nerve injuries. Those type of findings should also prompt emergent MRI evaluation. Treatment generally is long term immobilization in a collar however Type 3 and those with neurologic findings may require surgical intervention.
Anderson and Montesano Classification
Type I 3% of occipital condyle fracturesImpaction-type fracture with comminution of the occipital condyle
Due to compression between the atlantooccipital joint
Stable injury due to minimal fragment displacement into the foramen magnum
Type II 22% of occipital condyle fracturesBasilar skull fracture that extends into one or both occipital condyles
Due to a direct blow to skull and a sheer force to the atlantooccipital joint
Stable injury as the alar ligament and tectorial membrane are usually preserved
Type III 75% of occipital condyle fractures Avulsion fracture of condyle in region of the alar ligament attachment (suspect underlying occipitocervical dissociation)
Due to forced rotation with combined lateral bending
Has the potential to be unstable due to craniocervical disruption
The Trauma Frailty Index has been validated to predict inpatient mortality, major complications and discharge to rehab facility. “In addition, frailty was significantly associated with higher adjusted odds of mortality, major complications, readmissions, and fall recurrence at 3 months postdischarge ( p < 0.05).”
It is a simple 15 variable index.
This study suggests no. The control arm was given standard physical therapy and the intervention arm was instructed in four basic exercises to do on their own daily for a week. Patents were then surveyed to assess for long term pain. There was no difference in pain between the two groups. Meaning, at least in this study reliant on patient journaling and follow up, that these four simple exercises did not impact long term pain in chest wall injured patients. More work needs to be done in this important area.
In this randomized trial of restrictive oxygen (arterial oxygen sat of 94% ) vs. liberal oxygen (12-15 L of O2 per minute) for 8 hours after traumatic injury there was no difference in mortality or major respiratory complications at 30 days between the two groups.
Further evidence that managing hypoxia is important but over oxygenation at best offers no benefit and may add harm.
This prospective observational study looked at patients with liver lacerations and active contrast extravasation who either had immediate embolization vs. observation. After matching for age, injury score etc. the observation first approach did as well as those who had immediate embolization.
Fall from a height of 6 feet with back pain. Plain film shown. What is the diagnosis? Any further imaging indicated? Treatment? Disposition?
It is important for trauma and emergency care providers to understand what our patients experience prior to arrival in our clean, safe, and structured emergency department. It is also vitally important that we are involved in training and education in the pre-hospital environment. A group in the United Kingdom is challenging the age old “wisdom” that post-motor vehicle crash extrication should be slow, methodical, and work to have absolutely no movement in the spinal canal. Spinal immobilization and slow extrication instead of rapid resuscitation appears to be bad for patients. Based on several of their ground breaking papers they have published a 14 point recommendation of patient extrication post motor vehicle collision. Here are two important tenets they propose. For an in-depth discussion check out November 14, 2024 / CPD, Podcasts, Roadside to Resus.
The authors looked at 51 patients intubated with both anterior and posterior cervical collar in place and measured the degree of movement within the spine during intubation. They repeated this process in 51 additional patients with just the posterior portion of the collar in place. They found there was one degree of difference in movement between the two groups. This adds evidence that removing the anterior portion of the collar is safe when intubating trauma patients.
This retrospective study illustrates that the use of CT scanning to identify injury in gun shot wounds to the abdomen is not sensitive or specific enough to obviate the need for laparotomy. “Admission hypotension, abdominal pain and/or peritonitis, evisceration, and a transabdominal trajectory were considered clear indications for laparotomy.” If there is clear indication to go to the OR, stopping in CT does not add any benefit.
An out-of-hospital, randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, parallel group study was conducted in adult patients under the care of the city fire-based emergency medical services and the local level one trauma center. Adult male patients experiencing moderate to severe pain due to traumatic injuries received either 50mg of intranasal ketamine or placebo in addition to fentanyl after randomization in the field by the paramedic (a novel approach). The primary outcome was reduction of pain by 2 points 30 minutes after study drug administration.
199 patients were randomized with 107 receiving ketamine and 92 with placebo. Patients were young (30-40), and had a median weight of 83 kg. Pretreatment pain scores were 10/10 and patients presented to the ED 14 minutes after receiving study medication. The most common injuries were falls, MVC, and GSW. Half of the patients received IV fentanyl but others had IM or IN routes.
Ketamine receipt did not lead to a 2 point reduction in pain scores (36% vs 44.7% p = 0.22). There was no difference in pain at 3 hours, additional medications received, or total amount of analgesia received. Notably, there were no differences in adverse events.
Administration of prehospital TXA was found to improve 28 day mortality and decrease the amount of blood required to be transfused without any increased risk of thromboembolism or seizure. Two grams of TXA was superior to one gram and no TXA.
In this small retrospective study comparing outcomes before and after a prehospital blood administration protocol for penetrating trauma was initiated, the authors found improved survival in those receiving prehospital blood despite a five minute longer on scene time in those receiving blood. Also note TXA was part of the blood protocol but not the control group.
This study used the New York State hospital discharge database to look for factors associated with being the victim of repeat gun violence.
Unanswered questions include: is it similar in other areas, what interventions at the patient level could prevent this, what other patient level factors (substance use, etc) are involved, however, this is a good start in looking at this preventable disease.
Recent studies continue to highlight that Black, Native American, female, uninsured and Medicaid patients receive disproportionately more substance use screening when they are trauma patients. The authors of this paper point out that this inappropriate application of screening leads to missed opportunities.
“Screening patients for drug and alcohol use following injury is an evidence-based practice that can trigger wraparound care, such as brief substance use interventions, to prevent reinjury. Adolescents who consume alcohol but are not screened for alcohol use have 2- to 3- fold greater likelihood of reinjury compared with those who were screened and received a brief intervention.”
There is uncertainty if adding cryopercipitate empirically to all mass hemorrhage protocols has any benefit to mortality, need for transfusion, or any other meaningful outcome. This small study suggests it does not and that we should save the addition of cryopercipitate to those with lab proven low fibrinogen levels.
For penetrating neck trauma:
Does it violate the platysma if no, close wound and discharge
If yes, are there any hard signs of injury like enlarging hematoma, air from the wound, difficulty swallowing, blood in the airway, respiratory distress then to the OR
If no, Ct angio of the neck. If negative and no other findings admit for observation or discharge. If positive, to the OR. If equivocal, endoscopy and broncoscopy.
No longer think about the zones of the neck. Treat them all the same.
This article serves as a reminder that trauma can and will precipitate adrenal insufficiency and crisis in those trauma patients who are on steroids pre-injury. Look for prednisone or hydrocortisone as well as autoimmune or rheumatologic diseases on pre-injury medication list and history. Consider the diagnosis in trauma patients with refractory hypotension not responsive to vasopressors. Replacement therapy with hydrocortisone is the therapy.
Rectal injuries are rare and are usually associated with penetrating trauma or significant pelvic fracture from blunt injury. Diagnosis starts with physical exam including inspection for signs of trauma as well as a digital rectal exam looking for blood, bony protuberance and abnormal sphincter tone. Normal digital rectal exam does not exclude injury.
Imagining is important in making the diagnosis.
“Findings on CT associated with rectal injury include a wound tract extending to the rectum, a full-thickness wall defect, perirectal fat stranding, extraluminal free air, intraperitoneal free fluid, and hemorrhage within the bowel wall….A CT with any suggestion of rectal injury should therefore be followed up with rigid proctoscopy to confirm the diagnosis and location of injury, as a combination of CT and endoscopy has a sensitivity of 97% in the diagnosis of rectal injury.”
Rectal injuries are rare. The majority are secondary to penetrating injuries. Trauma care providers “should have a high clinical suspicion of rectal injury with any missile with a trajectory near the rectum; transpelvic gunshot wounds; stab injuries near the perineum, buttocks, groin, or proximal thighs; or open pelvic fractures. A digital rectal examination with a focus on sphincter tone, presence of blood, palpable defect, or bony protrusion should be carried out. Of note, a normal digital rectal examination does not exclude rectal injury.”
Ct scan with IV contrast (not PO or rectal) is used to identify rectal injuries but will be diagnostic in only 33% of injuries.
Rectal Injury Grading Scale
| Grade | Injury Type | Description of Injury |
|---|---|---|
| I | Hematoma laceration | Hematoma or hematoma without devascularization Partial-thickness laceration |
| II | Laceration | Laceration <50% of circumference |
| III | Laceration | Laceration ?50% of circumference |
| IV | Laceration | Full-thickness laceration with extension into perineum |
| V | Vascular | Devascularized segment |
