In 261 ED patients over age 65 receiving first generation antihistamines, 15% had an adverse reaction. Most common was delirium and urinary retention. Age over 85, previous cognitive impairment and multiple doses increased the risk of adverse reaction. Along with previous literature, this should discourage use of first generation antihistamines in older ED patients.
The Geriatric Measurement Tool (GMT) was used in this study prospectively to assess 24 hour mortality rate in ED patients over age 65. The GMT is a combination of FRAIL Questionnaire and Barthel index for Activity of Daily Living. The study found:
“ From 700 enrolled patients, GMT categorization revealed that 53.6% of patients were in Category-4 (moderate/more dependent and frail), while 34% were in Category-1 (independent or slight dependency, prefrail/fit). The 24-h mortality rate was 9%. GMT Category-4 demonstrated high sensitivity (87.3%) for mortality prediction, but low specificity (49.7%). Conversely, GMT Category-1 showed low sensitivity (44.1%) but high specificity (90.2%) for predicting discharge.”
Probably the biggest take away is we should be thinking about assessing our older patient's health status using some validated scale/tool to help us have conversations with patients and families regarding prognosis and interventions.
The Geriatric Measurement Tool combines the FRAIL Questionnaire with the Barthel Index For Daily Living to give a prognosis on your patient's mortality. First used to predict mortality in older patients with pneumonia during COVID-19 pandemic. Now being investigated for other ED patient populations.
FRAIL Questionnaire: Fatigue, Resistance, Aerobic, Illness, Weight loss. https://www.activeagingweek.com/pdf/abbott/FRAILQuestionnaire.pdf
Barthel: Ten questions about ADL's to create a score 0-100. https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/3912/barthel-index-activities-daily-living-adl
This study is a reminder of the efficacy of regional nerve blocks for older patient's with hip fractures. The authors trained EM physicians for 2 hours then evaluated delirium levels in patients who did and did not receive nerve blocks for hip fractures.
A prospective cohort of South Korean patients over 65 years admitted from the ED with critical illness had Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) performed on them. Those with a high CFS had increased 3 month mortality. CFS helps us prognosticate morbidity and mortality in our older critically ill patients.
In reviewing the limited literature available, the authors found that fascia iliaca blocks did not improve mortality but did improve hospital length of stay, decreased opiate use, and decreased delirium rates. More research is needed, however this tool should be added to our multimodal pain control toolbox.
These authors looked at survival to discharge pre and post-implementation of a single dose epinephrine protocol for out of hospital cardiac arrest as it relates to age ranges. They found that older patients had a survival rate of 12% in the single dose protocol compared to 6% in the multidose protocol. Younger and middle aged patients had no difference in survival pre and post-implementation. At least in older adults, epinephrine does not seem to offer much benefit when given more than one time during cardiac arrest.
This study looked at older patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of one of the following: RSV infection, UTI, influenza, fracture. Those patients with RSV had longer stays, higher mortality, higher ICU length of stay and interestingly more cardiovascular complications up to one year after hospitalization. Further evidence we should be testing for RSV in our ill older patients and encouraging vaccination.
These authors used information available from both the medical record as well as from a survey instrument given in the emergency department to created this fall risk score. A score over 6 had a 63% sensitivity and 75% specificity of predicting future falls.
Reenforcing the recent pearl on geriatric trauma patient care, here is the National Association EMS Physicians statement on prehospital care.
"EMS clinicians should use age-adjusted, physiologic criteria to guide decisions to transport geriatric trauma patients to the most appropriate level of trauma center available in the community.
Geriatric trauma patients should be promptly evaluated for pain and should receive analgesic interventions in a timely manner. Analgesic medications should be dosed following weight-based guidance and should be administered with consideration of potential drug interactions and age-related changes in drug metabolism and side effects.
EMS clinicians should consult advance care planning documents, e.g., Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), when available, to guide care in emergency scenarios, including management of traumatic injuries.
While older patients are at higher risk for spinal injuries, including lumbar and cervical spine fractures, traditional spinal motion restriction practices may not be suitable for older patients due to age-related anatomic changes in spinal alignment and increased risk for cutaneous pressure-related injuries. EMS clinicians should exercise judgment to determine when and how to best achieve spinal motion restriction if spinal injury is suspected in geriatric trauma patients."
This retrospective study looking at a readmission database for patients greater than 65 years categorized 10,000 patients into non-frail, pre-frail and frail based on the five-factor modified frailty index. They found no difference in recurrent diverticulitis among the groups but did find:
“frailty was a predictor of mortality on index hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio, 1.99; p < 0.001) and readmissions (adjusted odds ratio, 3.05; p < 0.001)…frail patients are at increased risk of mortality once they develop diverticulitis. Optimal management for frail patients with diverticulitis must be defined to improve outcomes.”
Once again, assessing your patient's frailty can help you predict outcomes and have meaningful discussions with patients and their families.
This editorial reminds us about the use of frailty measures in the geriatric population.
The authors write that frailty “describes a state of vulnerability causing an impaired ability to maintain homeostasis due to reduced physiologic reserve. Frailty is associated with disability, multimorbidity, cognitive impairment, institutionalization, and mortality. **Analogous to troponin testing, frailty assessment has been used to risk stratify older adults.**”
They also remind us that frailty is a syndrome not a disease in and of itself. It impacts how disease affects the patient and should inform our care, but not generate ageism or therapeutic nihilism.
Once frailty is identified, it allows for further assessment looking at the “Geriatric 5M's framework: Mind, Mobility, Medications, Multicomplexity, and Matters Most.”
A scoping review of the literature regarding anxiety in older patients found the follow areas had the biggest impact on anxiety level:
“The variables most strongly associated with anxiety—either as risk or protective factors—are age, female gender, physical activity, physical health conditions, depression, perceived and family support, and social participation. New variables linked to anxiety include body mass index (BMI) and dietary habits.”
Asking questions related to these areas can give you a better picture of your patient’s risk for anxiety.
This prospective cohort study from Germany found an under triage rate of 58% of trauma patients over 70 years presenting to 12 trauma centers. One area that consistently lead to undertriage was not using a systolic blood pressure under 110 as a criteria for trauma team activation.
The older cohort had 3 times the mortality than younger, were more likely not to arrive by helicopter and mechanism was more commonly ground level fall. This study echos many others in USA and Australia. Better trauma triage criteria are needed for older patients.
An open label pragmatic study in 29 Japanese hospitals randomized septic shock patients over age 65 to either a high (MAP 80-85) or control (65-70) group. They then looked at all cause 90 day mortality. The study was stopped early due to a significantly higher percentage of mortality in the higher MAP group.
The study isn’t blinded and is only done in one country, however it does raise the question of what is the ideal MAP for older septic shock patients.
In mid-2024 the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced a new quality measure entitled Age Friendly Hospital Measure. The initial phase went into effect 1/1/25. It is built around programs from the American College of Surgeons, the American College of Emergency Physicians as well as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). It is modeled around the IHI’s 4M Framework.
As a reminder, prescribing medications to older patients should be done with caution because of changed physiology, co-morbid conditions and other currently used medications. The Beers Criteria is a helpful list of medications that may cause trouble for your older patients. https://www.guidelinecentral.com/guideline/340784/#section-2776198 is a list of medications to either avoid or prescribe carefully in this patient population.
Pay particular attention to medications that have anticholinergic properties as they cause change in mental status and increase the risk for falls.
This study attempts to validate the use of the Geriatric Fever Score to predict 30 day mortality in patients over age 65 presenting to an emergency department with fever.
The Geriatric Fever Score uses: leukocytosis, severe coma, and thrombocytopenia. One point is award for each abnormality.
Not surprisingly, mortality went up with the higher the score (33%, 42% and 57% for 0,1,2 points)
For me, I’m not discharging anyone with severe coma, leukocytosis or thrombocytopenia in this patient population therefore I’m not sure this scale has much utility for the practicing emergency physician.
This article serves as a great reminder that our older patients are on a significant amount of medications and many of these medications effect cognition. Cognitively impaired patients are at risk of medication errors. High risk medications in older patients include anticoagulants, opioids, anticholinergics, hypoglycemic/insulin and sedating medications. The authors found:
It is important to ask how the patient takes (or doesn’t take) their medications as well as other social determinate of health such as living alone.
Prioritizing the timely admission of older patients from the emergency department (ED) to appropriate wards is essential to reduce adverse events, such as falls and infections, and to decrease the duration of hospital stays. Recent cohort studies, both observational and prospective, have demonstrated that elderly patients who experienced prolonged or overnight stays in the ED had a higher in-hospital mortality rate compared to those who were admitted earlier to inpatient care. Efficient patient flow and early admission from the ED to appropriate wards are crucial strategies for improving survival rates and reducing morbidity among older patients.
