Category: Critical Care
Keywords: CPR, ventilation, respiratory rate, PaCO2 (PubMed Search)
Posted: 6/27/2017 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD
Click here to contact Mike Winters, MBA, MD
Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Chang MP, Idris AH. The past, present, and future of ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2017; 23:188-192.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: ACLS, cardiac arrest, resuscitation, epinephrine (PubMed Search)
Posted: 6/13/2017 by Kami Windsor, MD
Click here to contact Kami Windsor, MD
In patients with persistent VT/VF cardiac arrest, giving epinephrine before the 2nd defibrillation attempt (which should follow initial shock and 2 minutes of CPR) is associated with decreased ROSC, decreased hospital survival, and decreased functional outcome.
Take Home Point:
"Electricity before Epi" in patients with persistent VT/VF arrest, at least for the initial epinephrine dose.
Background Info:
While the ACLS algorithm does recommend initial defibrillation followed by 2 minutes of CPR and repeated shock if the shockable rhythm persists, the 2015 AHA Guidelines update admits that there is insufficient evidence to comment on “optimal timing” of epinephrine administration in these patients.
A 2016 study of 2794 patients across 310 hospitals looked at patients with cardiac arrest with initial shockable rhythm and found that compared to patients who received epinephrine after the second defibrillation attempt, patients who received epinephrine in the first 2 minutes before the 2nd shock had:
The benefit of 2nd-shock-first was maintained when groups were matched using a propensity score accounting for baseline characteristics of the patients, events, and hospitals.
References:
Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-64.
Early administration of epinephrine (adrenaline) in patients with cardiac arrest with initial shockable rhythm in hospital: propensity score matched analysis. Andersen LW, Kurth T, Chase M, et al. BMJ. 2016;353:i1577.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: POCUS, Massive PE (PubMed Search)
Posted: 6/6/2017 by Rory Spiegel, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Rory Spiegel, MD
The poor sensitivity of bedside echocardiography to identify all-comers with pulmonary embolism is well documented. Most series cite a sensitivity and specificity of 31% to 72% and 87% to 98%, respectively (1,2). But as Nazerian et al demonstrate in their recent publication in Internal and Emergency Medicine, the diagnostic performance of bedside echocardiography is far more reliable in the subset of patients presenting in shock (3).
Of the 105 patients included in the final analysis, in 43 (40.9%) PE was determined to be the etiology of their shock. Bedside echo demonstrated notable diagnostic prowess when employed in this subset of patients, sensitivity (91%), specificity (87%), –LR (0.11), +LR (7.03). The sensitivity and –LR were further augmented when the venous US of the LE was included (sensitivity of 95% and –LR of 0.06) in the diagnostic workup.
1. Dresden S, Mitchell P, Rahimi L, et al. Right ventricular dilatation on bedside echocardiography performed by emergency physicians aids in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;63(1):16-24.
2. Nazerian P, Vanni S, Volpicelli G, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2014;145(5):950-957.
3. Nazerian P, Volpicelli G, Gigli C, Lamorte A, Grifoni S, Vanni S. Diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac and venous ultrasound examinations in patients with shock and suspected pulmonary embolism. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;
Category: Critical Care
Posted: 5/23/2017 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Mike Winters, MBA, MD
Antibiotics in Sepsis
Leisman D, et al. Delayed second-dose antibiotics for patients admitted from the emergency department with sepsis: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes. Crit Care Med. 2017; 45:956-65.
Category: Critical Care
Posted: 5/16/2017 by Kami Windsor, MD
Click here to contact Kami Windsor, MD
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a valid option in the management of acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) without hypercapnia, as evidenced by multiple studies including the FLORALI trial. Failure of HFNC, however, may result in delayed intubation and worsened clinical outcomes.
Factors predicting HFNC failure and subsequent intubation include:
Consider whether or not HFNC is appropriate in your patient with AHRF, and if you use it, reevaluate your patient to ensure improvement, or escalate their respiratory support.
For patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure without hypercapnia, the FLORALI trial demonstrated that high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy increases ventilator-free days, reduces 90-day mortality, and is associated with better comfort and lower dyspnea severity when compared to conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Failure of HFNC, however, may result in delayed intubation and worse clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. So how do we predict in the ED which patients are going to fail?
Sztrymf et al. evaluated patients placed on HFNC for nonhypercapneic acute hypoxic respiratory failure, who later went on to require endotracheal intubation. The cohort who failed HFNC had significantly:
- higher RR at 30 & 45 minutes after initiation of HFNC
- lower SpO2% at 15, 30, and 60 minutes
- higher incidence of paradoxical breathing (thoracoabdominal dyssynchrony) at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes
In an observational study of patients with ARDS,* Messika et al. found that factors predicting HFNC failure included:
- a higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II; 46 v. 29, p=.001)
- additional organ system failure (mostly hemodynamic or neurological)
- trends towards lower PaO2:FiO2 ratios and higher RR
So don’t set it and forget it! Consider a different method of respiratory support if your patient has multi-organ system failure, especially if they are in shock or have altered mental status. If you do use HFNC, reevaluate your patient at 15 minutes and again at 30 minutes to make sure their respiratory rate and SpO2 have improved and that there is no paradoxic breathing (or it is resolving). If not, move on to NIV or invasive mechanical ventilation.
*acute respiratory failure occurring within 1 week of known clinical insult with PaO2:FiO2 <300mmHg and bilateral opacities on chest x-ray not attributable to cardiac failure/volume overload
1. Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, et al. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2185–96.
2. Sztrymf B, Messika J, Bertrand F, et al. Beneficial effects of humidified high flow nasal oxygen in critical care patients: a prospective pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1780–6.
3. Messika J, Ben Ahmed K, Gaudry S, et al. Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in subjects with ARDS: a 1-year observational study. Respir Care. 2015;60(2):162-9.
4. Hernandez G, Roca O, Colinas L. High-flow nasal cannula support therapy: new insights and improving performance. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):62.
Category: Critical Care
Posted: 4/25/2017 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Mike Winters, MBA, MD
Ventilator Settings for the Post-Arrest Patient
Jentzer JC, et al. Recent developments in the management of patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. J Crit Care. 2017; 39:97-107.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: Central venous catheter, ultrasound (PubMed Search)
Posted: 4/18/2017 by Kami Windsor, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Kami Windsor, MD
Save time by using bedside ultrasound to confirm above-the-diaphragm central venous catheter (CVC) placement rather than waiting for chest x-ray confirmation:
1. Perform rapid push of saline (it doesn’t have to be agitated) through CVC while cardiac probe is placed with right atrium in view. Immediate visualization of bubbles (or “atrial swirl”) essentially confirms correct placement.
2. Perform the usual search for ipsilateral lung-sliding and the waves-on-the-beach to rule out procedural pneumothorax.
It makes sense that it’s going to be faster for you to use that internal jugular/subclavian central venous catheter (CVC) you just placed if you confirm with bedside ultrasound instead of waiting for the radiology tech to get the chest x-ray. But what’s the data?
Using pooled data from of 15 studies with 1553 CVC placements, Ablordeppey et al. found that ultrasound had a sensitivity of 86% and 98% specificity for detecting catheter malposition, with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 31.1 and a negative LR of 0.25. There was an almost 100% sensitivity and specificity for pneumothorax detection, and reduced confirmation time by 58 minutes.These findings are generally consistent across the board for the other studies out there.
1. Ablordeppey EA, Drewry AM, Beyer AB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of central venous catheter confirmation by bedside ultrasound versus chest radiography in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2017; 45(4): 715-24.
2. Gekle R, Dubensky L, Haddad S, et al. Saline flush test: Can bedside sonography replace conventional radiography for confirmation of above-the-diaphragm central venous catheter placement? J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(7):1295-9.
3. Weekes AJ, Johnson DA, Keller SM. Central vascular catheter placement evaluation using saline flush and bedside echocardiography. Acad Emerg Med. 2014; 21:65-72.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: Hyperoxia, Mechanical Ventilation (PubMed Search)
Posted: 4/11/2017 by Rory Spiegel, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Rory Spiegel, MD
The deleterious effects of hyperoxia are becoming more and more apparent. But obtaining a blood gas to ensure normoxia in a busy Emergency Department can be burdensome. And while the utilization of a non-invasive pulse oximeter seems ideal, the threshold that best limits the rate of hyperoxia is unclear.
Durlinger et al in a prospective observational study demonstrated that an oxygen saturation 95% or less effectively limited the number of patients with hyperoxia (PaO2 of greater than 100 mm Hg). Conversely when an SpO2 of 100% was maintained, 84% of the patients demonstrated a PaO2 of greater than 100 mm Hg.
Durlinger EM, Spoelstra-de man AM, Smit B, et al. Hyperoxia: At what level of SpO2 is a patient safe? A study in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. J Crit Care. 2017;
Category: Critical Care
Posted: 3/28/2017 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Mike Winters, MBA, MD
DSI, Ketamine, and Apnea
Driver BE, Reardon RF. Apnea after low-dose ketamine sedation during attempted delayed sequence intubation. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 69:34-35.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: lung protective ventilation, ARDS (PubMed Search)
Posted: 3/21/2017 by Rory Spiegel, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Rory Spiegel, MD
While lung protective ventilatory strategies have long been accepted as vital to the management of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, the translation of such practices to the Emergency Department is still limited and inconsistent.
Fuller et al employed a protocol ensuring lung-protective tidal volumes, appropriate setting of positive end-expiratory pressure, rapid weaning of FiO2, and elevating the head-of-bed. The authors found the number of patients who had lung protective strategies employed in the Emergency Department increased from 46.0% to 76.7%. This increase in protective strategies was associated with a 7.1% decrease in the rate of pulmonary complications (ARDS and VACs), 14.5% vs 7.4%, and a 14.3% decrease in in-hospital mortality, 34.1% vs 19.6%.
Fuller BM, Ferguson IT, Mohr NM, et al. Lung-Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department (LOV-ED): A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;
Category: Critical Care
Posted: 3/7/2017 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Mike Winters, MBA, MD
Preoxygenation in Critically Ill Patients
Mosier JM, Hypes CD, Sackles JC. Understanding preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation during intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43:226-8.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: Ketamine, agitated delirium (PubMed Search)
Posted: 2/28/2017 by Rory Spiegel, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Rory Spiegel, MD
A recently published study adds to the growing body of literature supporting the use of IV//IM ketamine as a first line agent for the control of the acutely agitated patient. In this observational cohort Riddell et al found patients given ketamine more frequently achieved adequate sedation at both 5 and 10 minutes compared to benzodiazepines, Haloperidol, given alone or in combination. This rapid sedation was achieved without an increase in the need for additional sedation or the rate of adverse events.
Riddell J, Tran A, Bengiamin R, Hendey GW, Armenian P. Ketamine as a first-line treatment for severely agitated emergency department patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2017
Category: Critical Care
Posted: 2/14/2017 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Mike Winters, MBA, MD
Sepsis Mimics
Long B, Koyfman A. Clinical mimics: An emergency medicine-focused review of sepsis mimics. J Emerg Med. 2017; 52:34-42.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: peri-Intubation hypotension, shock index (PubMed Search)
Posted: 2/7/2017 by Rory Spiegel, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Rory Spiegel, MD
Identifying patients at risk of hypotension during intubation is not always straight forward. The prevalence of peri-intubation hypotension in the Emergency Department has been demonstrated to be approximately 20%.1 And while certain variables increase the likelihood of peri-intubation hypotension (ex. Shock index> 0.80), no single factor predicts it accurately enough to be used at the bedside.2 In the majority of patients undergoing intubation, clinicians should be prepared for peri-intubation hypotension with either vasopressor infusions or push dose pressors.
1. Heffner AC, Swords D, Kline JA, Jones AE. The frequency and significance of postintubation hypotension during emergency airway management. J Crit Care. 2012;27(4):417.e9-13.
2. Heffner AC, Swords DS, Nussbaum ML, Kline JA, Jones AE. Predictors of the complication of postintubation hypotension during emergency airway management. J Crit Care. 2012;27(6):587-93.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: Sepsis, Septic Shock, Fluid resuscitation (PubMed Search)
Posted: 1/31/2017 by Daniel Haase, MD
(Updated: 2/18/2017)
Click here to contact Daniel Haase, MD
At the Society of Critical Care Meeting (SCCM) this month, updates to the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines were released. Recommendations include:
--Initial 30mL/kg crystalloid resuscitation with frequent reassessment of fluid responsiveness using dynamic (not static) measures [goodbye CVP/ScvO2!]
--Initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics within ONE hour of sepsis recognition [two agents from different classes]
--Further hemodynamic assessement (e.g. echo for cardiac function) if clinical assessment does not reveal the type of shock [get out the ultrasound!]
Rhodes A, Evans LE, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 18.
Category: Critical Care
Posted: 1/24/2017 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD
Click here to contact Mike Winters, MBA, MD
Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis
Kawano T, et al. Epinephrine use in older patients with anaphylaxis: Clinical outcomes and cardiovascular complications. Resuscitation 2017; 112:53-58.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: Arterial Line, Ultrasound (PubMed Search)
Posted: 1/17/2017 by Rory Spiegel, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Rory Spiegel, MD
It is not uncommon for critically ill patients to require invasive monitoring of their blood pressure. In these patients, radial arterial lines are often inserted. Traditionally these lines are placed using palpation of the radial pulse. This technique can lead to unacceptably high failure rate in the hypotensive patient commonly encountered in the Emergency Department.
A recent meta-analysis by Gu et al demonstrated the use of dynamic US to assist in the placement of radial arterial lines decreased the rate of first attempt failure, time to line insertion and the number of adverse events associated with insertion.
Gu WJ, Wu XD, Wang F, Ma ZL, Gu XP. Ultrasound Guidance Facilitates Radial Artery Catheterization: A Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Chest. 2016;149(1):166-79.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: Sepsis, Antibiotics, Septic Shock (PubMed Search)
Posted: 1/10/2017 by Daniel Haase, MD
(Updated: 2/18/2017)
Click here to contact Daniel Haase, MD
--Recent meta-analysis comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics demonstrates mortality benefit (NNT = 15) in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. (1)
--Consider beta-lactam continuous infusion on your septic patients if your hospital pharmacy allows
[Thanks to Anne Weichold, CRNP for providing the article for this pearl!]
--Beta-Lactams are time-dependent antibiotics (i.e. longer time above MIC = more time killing) annd continuous infusions should have concentrations consistently above MIC.
--Previous studies not powered to demonstrate mortality benefit, but showed pharmocokinetic improvement and higher rates of clinical cure (2)
Pratical aspects
This means the patient will require an additional IV most of the time
Most hospitals do not have a pharmacy protocol for infusion of most extended-spectrum B-lactams
1. Roberts JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, Davis JS, et al. Continuous versus Intermittent B-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2016; 194 (6): 681-91.
2. Abdul-Aziz MH, Sulaiman H, Mat-Nor MB, et al. Beta-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis (BLISS): a prospective, two-centre, open-labelled randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42 (10) 1535-45.
Category: Critical Care
Posted: 1/3/2017 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD
Click here to contact Mike Winters, MBA, MD
PaCO2 and the Post-Arrest Patient
McKenzie N, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between arterial carbon dioxide tension and outcomes after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2017; 111:116-126.
Category: Critical Care
Keywords: Acute pulmonary edema, Bolus nitrates (PubMed Search)
Posted: 12/27/2016 by Rory Spiegel, MD
(Updated: 1/14/2025)
Click here to contact Rory Spiegel, MD
It is well known that the early aggressive utilization of IV nitrates and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) in patients presenting with acute pulmonary edema will decrease the number of patients requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Often our tepid dosing of nitroglycerine is to blame for treatment failure. Multiple studies have demonstrated the advantages of bolus dose nitroglycerine in the early management of patients with acute pulmonary edema. In these cohorts, patients bolused with impressively high doses of IV nitrates every 5 minutes, are intuabted less frequently than patients who received a standard infusion (1,2). No concerning drops in blood pressure in the patients who received bolus doses of nitrates were observed. Using the standard 200 micrograms/ml nitroglycerine concentration, blood pressure can be rapidly titrated to effect.
1. Cotter G, Metzkor E, Kaluski E, et al. Randomised trial of high-dose isosorbide dinitrate plus low-dose furosemide versus high-dose furosemide plus low-dose isosorbide dinitrate in severe pulmonary oedema. Lancet. 1998;351(9100):389-93.
2. Levy P, Compton S, Welch R, et al. Treatment of severe decompensated heart failure with high-dose intravenous nitroglycerin: a feasibility and outcome analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(2):144-52